Loading...
Loading...
3 posts
← All writingTL;DR: Organizations buy AI without defining what success looks like. They deploy tools, run pilots, create governance frameworks, but skip the step of connecting technology to measurable outcomes. The result is expensive theater that produces activity without results. Why most AI initiatives fail: * No measurable outcome defined before deployment * Procurement processes designed for deterministic software, not probabilistic AI * Missing translation layer between technical capability and bu
Prose specifications can't be verified. A constitutional stack needs a runtime, and a runtime needs structured data.
I've watched the same pattern repeat across dozens of organizations in the past 18 months. A leadership team sees a demo. Someone in the room plays with ChatGPT over lunch. The conversation shifts from "should we" to "how fast can we" in a single meeting. The deployment begins before anyone checks what's actually under the hood. This isn't a story about technology moving too fast. This is about organizations moving faster than their ability to understand what they're deploying. The gap between